Monday, February 24, 2014

The Contrast: Jonathon



As seen in other posts, it can be said that both Jonathon and Colonel Manly are both patriotic. Because both are so patriotic in the story, they both symbolize their country, the U.S.A. However, only Colonel Manly gets the girl at the end. Why didn’t Jonathon end up happy with a girl, too? What was Jonathon’s role? (These two questions remind me of that class lecture where Zanetto’s death was questioned in “The Venetian Twins.”)
                In analyzing the situation, it can be implied that Jonathon represents the stereotypical ignorant, simple-minded American seen by foreigners, whereas Colonel Manly represents the honorable, intelligent, respectful, model American. It’s highly possible that Jonathon didn’t get a girl in the end because he didn’t deserve it. First off, he’s too ignorant and naïve to have a girlfriend. He thought the lady outside the Holy Ground was the deacon’s kind, innocent daughter when she was actually some prostitute standing there. He thought the actors in the play “The Poor Soldier” were part of reality. Jessamy was able to manipulate Jonathon into disgusting Jenny by tricking him into thinking multiple bows, excessive kisses, and incoherent speech on love were the ways to court a lady. Jonathon is not capable to be any woman’s man if he’s too stupid to take care of her.
                The second reason for Jonathon not being matched up in the end is because Jenny and Tabitha didn’t seem compatible with him. When Jenny was first introduced in the play, one of things she said was “Why, Jonathon, the New-England colonel’s servant. Do you know he was at the play last night, and the stupid creature don’t know where he has been (pg. 32).” She calls him stupid and defines him as some animal. Tabitha may seem his only other option, but she’s not. He tells Jessamy in their conversation, “There’s Tabitha Wymen, the deacon’s daughter…. She and I have been courting a great while…. I broke a piece of money with her when we parted, and she promised not to spark it with Solomon Dyer while I am gone (pg. 27-28).” It’s not really true love or a good match if he has to pay his girl to promise to not get with another man. Also, Jonathon admits that a bonus with getting with Tabitha is that her father is rich. He then abandons the idea of getting with Tabitha when Jessamy mentions the better wealth in other women. Thus, Jonathon seems to be some gold digger.
                Even though Jonathon symbolizes the simple-minded, ignorant American, “Jonathon’s basic good intentions are redeemed in his loyalty to Colonel Manly (pg 3).” He was still a loyal friend to Colonel Manly.  He was still a patriotic character. His questions towards Jessamy showed he had a chance of understanding how to court women: “Well, but suppose she should be angry with I?... Must I buss her when I am introduced to her (pg. 29)?” Why give his character a decent ending? It can be said that although Jonathon did not get the happy ending with a girl, he still has a potential to earn it. Symbolically, it can be interpreted as this: Americans who are naïve or ignorant have the potential to educate/better themselves. They have the potential to become like Colonel Manly, a true model American. That’s why Jonathon wasn’t given a girl in the end, but was given a decent ending.

3 comments:

  1. Okay, first off, I have to admit that one of the reasons that I clicked on your post is because of your labels. I busted out laughing when I saw "whore" tacked on to the end.

    Okay, now that my immature admission is out of the way, I can get on to actually responding to your post.

    I liked that you brought up "The Venetian Twins" discussion, but I feel like this situation had more to do with why the servants in the play never ended up together rather than why Zanetto had to die. Though Jonathan's story line was fun and entertaining, it didn't really have anything to do with the main driving plot. Plus, he was just the servant.. err "waiter" of Manly, so like the servants in "Twins," he and the other minor characters (like Jenny and Jessamy) don't really rank a "wrap up" as far as story line goes.

    -Andrea

    ReplyDelete
  2. I hadn't thought of Jonathan in quite that way. Jonathan seems to directly personify the "bad" that Manly mentions America should accept and overcome.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The way that you summarized Jessamy in this post actually made me realize how much he is like Pancrazio from The Venetian Twins. The relationship that Jessamy and Jonathan have and the relationship that Pancrazio and Zanetto have are quite similar. I do have to agree with Andrea that there are some major differences between the fate of Zanetto and that of Jonathan. Jonathan did not have to be expelled from the world of the play, as did Zanetto. I did enjoy your comparison though of the Colonel and Jonathan though as the two sides of Americans!

    ReplyDelete