A
recurring theme I have been seeing in these plays is cunning characters getting
away with manipulating facts and other characters and basically bad behavior
being rewarded in general.
Be it
arguing because they did not get their way, stealing food, or infidelity, the
protagonists in these plays are not good. There seems to be an overwhelming
theme of rewarding moral deviance. In The
Nose Dance, the characters are very proud of their large, gnarly, warted
noses (something that people today would be very embarrassed about). In this
regard, they are very proud and boastful, things that we are usually encouraged
against. Then, once the winner is announced, this group of fully grown men
throw a temper tantrum. A fight breaks out over whether the rules should be
changed because the majority were unhappy with the decision. Instead of being
happy that they were even considered (or even giving the mayor a chance to
announce the runners up), they turn an otherwise happy event sour.
In
stories like The Stolen Bacon, The Wife in the Well, and The Farmer with the Blur, the guilty
party manages to make their victims look like the guilty party. Not that the
victims were innocents (stingy, drunk, and abusive to say the least), but for
the crimes that take place in the plays, they are wrongly blamed… or just
tricked entirely.
I
realize that these are all plays meant to poke fun at society (corrupted
priests and marriages, anyone), but it seems odd to present them like this.
Rarely have I seen this level of amorality presented in such a light-hearted
way. While reading, I could definitely imagine the actors working the crowd and
swaying them to cheer on these characters, and I think that’s what threw me off
the most with it. Usually, when it comes to morality in plays, the characters
are encouraged to be the best they can be, and this seemed to throw all of that
out the window. I wouldn’t say that these characters are more real than the
ones in the morality plays I’ve read in the past, though. I think people as a
whole are neither as pious as they are in the morality plays nor as corrupt as
they are in these.
-Andrea
-Andrea
It could be the flip in this good vs evil theme that adds to the comic value of the plays? I'm not sure, but I noticed this recurring theme as well, and can't help but wonder if this harkens back to Aristotle's definition of comedy -- that it has something to do with ugliness (in this instance, "evil").
ReplyDeleteGreat question, Whitney...ugliness clearly plays a role in "The Nose Dance" and we have to ask ourselves why would such ugliness be put on stage?
DeleteYou bring up some excellent examples of inversion, especially inversion of morality. The question we will seek to answer in class tomorrow is: "why do so many of these carnival plays feature an inversion of morality?"
ReplyDelete