Many comedies exploit particular
human flaws, perhaps slipping on a patch of ice in slapstick comedy, or perhaps
the language and mannerisms of a culture like in The Contrast. The Broken Jug seems to do just this, but it
also seems to be trying to drive home a message: that the court system is in
need of reform. This is in fact a German
tradition, and often times referred to as Political Kabarett.
In this comedy Judge Adam is
clearly guilty, and anyone with half a brain can tell you that he is one hell
of a shady guy. This is clearly indicated
with his the insane fabrications that he tells his secretary when being asked
about the wounds he bears. The audience
also knows from his reaction to the people who came in with the broken jug that
he had something to do with it. This
leaves the audience to wonder how long it will take for the people of the
village to figure out that Adam is probably the one who committed the
crime. In fact, were it not for the help
of an Judge from Utrecht and the clever assistant, Ruprecht would most likely
have faced incarceration, since Judge Adam was perceived as the ultimate
authority and above suspicion.
This is not the first comedy to
attempt to have this sort of impact on an audience. It must avoid censorship, and so it is placed
in the Netherlands and it is mixed in with all sorts of Dutch stereotypes like
the maids walking around the house in Klompen shoes and the exaggerated love of
cheese when Adam dumps a big block of cheese in front of Walter as a “snack”. In all the ridicule and seeming mockery of
the Dutch people, there seems to be this deeper message that is typically found
in Political Kabarett, and does it in a subtle way.
I agree that the play hides a deeper significance. I think the author really did a good job 'concealing' his true message in stereotypes and jokes about those stereotypes.
ReplyDeleteI always like posts that display the historical context. I discussed the audience, albeit in a different way, in my post.
ReplyDelete