Monday, March 24, 2014

Society: The Beaver Coat

At the beginning of the semester, I had been under the impression that comedy, or the comedic process behind it, would in some way exemplify the best (or the ideal) in society. The characters in The Hangover, for instance, practically play the parts of fools, and put themselves into situations that, rather than be exemplified, are meant to be looked down upon, or avoided. In the television series Arrested Development, the funniest situations are when the characters act their worst -- when Lucille suggests the family commit perjury, when George Sr. jumps ship and tries to abandon his family, when Buster defies his mother's wishes and gets his hand bitten off by a seal because of it. All of these actions come from a moral tilt, and the consequences are just as twisted. Because of my exposure to these types of stories, I figured, in the end, the message to society was: don't do these bad things, or you'll look stupid too.

And who wants to be judged like that?
(img: source)

But in my reading of The Beaver Coat, I noticed something different. We haven't analyzed the text in class yet, so I'm certain there are other elements to this that I haven't even seen yet, but I still recognized something that made me pause. Mrs. Wolff isn't the "good guy." She uses deception and cunning to get her way, and, the important part, she isn't made the fool because of it.

The people who were being taken advantage of were further pushed into a comic role because of the fact that they were being taken advantage of. The moral of the story wasn't telling society to be nice. It didn't say it was a social obligation to be truthful. The Beaver Coat exemplified a sort of weasel-like cunning, without the consequence of being made fun of, or ultimately bowing to a more morally upright point of view.

This fact brought with it a whole new dimension of flexibility within social constructs. If anything, it made me wonder if cunning and deception were considered positive qualities at the time this play was performed. But beyond anything else, it showed me the great range of who (or what) society might call the butt of the joke.

2 comments:

  1. Reading The Beaver Coat surprised me too in that "The moral of the story wasn't telling society to be nice." I thought on your last sentence of "who society might call the butt of the joke." It reminded me of what Northrop Frye said: "Comedy is designed not to condemn evil, but to ridicule a lack of self-knowledge." When reading The Beaver Coat, I found it funny that everyone in the courthouse was oblivious to Mrs. Wolff being the suspect. I also laughed while reading The Broken Jug , even at Ruprecht. He was so mad, and he didn't realize the guy who blackmailed his girlfriend was sitting right in front of him. I laugh at the lack of self-knowledge of characters whether their good or bad. It doesn't mean the morals of these cunning, intelligent characters should be SUPPORTED (in my opinion), but their cunningness and deception should be ADMIRED as positive qualities as you were saying in your post.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I don’t think Mrs. Wolff is the good guy to the people she is manipulating, but from her family’s perspective, she is their hero-the person who is saving them from demise and using all her resources to get them what they desire. I think they do admire her, because if she were bogged down in self-pity and helplessness, who would lead them? I think she is definitely their ‘good guy’.

    ReplyDelete