Written as a satire (very) loosely
based on the Odyssey, O Brother, Where Art Thou? Is
the story of three men who escape imprisonment to hunt for one of the
men's (Everett McGill, played by George Clooney) $1.2 million he
claimed to have stolen.
I
believe one could argue that the film demonstrates the four causes.
The primary argument for this being that it is revealed ultimately
that Everett lies to the men to get him to join him; the real cause
for his escape was to reunite with his wife, who had written him a
letter informing him of her decision to remarry. This link is a good
example of at least two of the causes and a good example of the movie
in general.
It
could also be said that there is a sort of green world in the film.
It begins almost as soon as the movie does, when the trio escape the
chain gang. They come across a blind man on a handcar who accurately
predict their future. Over the course of the film they are tempted
by sirens, assaulted by a cyclops, and become a musical sensation.
The green world fades after the resolution and the blind fortune
teller is seen rolling away on his handcar.
Much
like The Broken Jug or
the collection of plays from the beginning of the semester, it also
satires the authorities of the period it is set in. Homer Stokes is
a man running for office who is secretly a member of the KKK. “Big
Dan” is a Bible salesman who mugs Everett and friends when he
believes they have something of value. The sheriff is bent on
capturing the three men, and is literally believed to be the devil by
one of the main characters.
And
finally a smaller scene that is probably one of my favorite comedy
things.
I love this movie. I think that as it can be somewhat solemn and low at times, it would be an interesting challenge to pull examples of the kind of comedy we discussed out of the film. Definitely worth watching and discussing.
ReplyDeleteDefinitely difficult, but I feel like it has something to offer. I felt like a lot of my post was stretching it regarding class connections.
DeleteStill, a bold choice, Matt. The "unsavory" characters in the text are exposed, killed off, or reintegrated into the society at the end, so it does seem appropriate in parts. Yet the Coen bros are not known for making a straight-forward film, so it might prove tricky...
ReplyDelete