Brandon Q. Day and Stevan L. Hartman
THE PROBLEM
After we (the class members- ourselves
included- who seem to be pursuing careers in some area of science, as a whole)
read The Beaver Coat, we were mostly quite disappointed with the ending.
One reader said that he felt that nothing had been gained by reading this play;
another reader had a problem with the fact that justice had not been served to
the wrong-doer. Because of these reactions, my partner and I were drawn to this
play with the idea of seeing if we could create a new ending for The Beaver
Coat that might “fix” the play for us and our fellow classmates.
THE PURPOSE
What we hope to gain from this project is
to see if an ending that provides closure and a sense of justice for the reader
gets a better response from the audience. If some readers do not like our ending,
but did like The Beaver Coat after we read it earlier in the semester,
why? Will those entering the field of science react more positively to this new
ending than those going into fields more abstract such as English and history?
Dr. Sheehan talked about the two vastly different receptions of the play, as it
was originally performed, and how one group absolutely hated it, while another
thought it was the best thing since sliced butter. We want to experiment, and
see whether adding a closing, final act with resolution would cause these groups
to ultimately reverse their opinions. We will provide hypotheses on the
outcomes of our experiment, and present them on the board as well.
THE METHOD
Although we reviewed the idea, we did not
like the idea of writing an entire final act for The Beaver Coat, simply
because we cannot write in the exact same fashion as Gerhart Hauptmann. We
believed that if we had attempted this, the audience would be more affected by
the inconsistency of the two contrasting writing styles than the actual
content. So, instead we plan to outline the series of events that occur in our
final act and tie each event back to instances in The Beaver Coat in
order to prove to the audience that the events we come up with are not just “coming
out of left field.” The final act will be centered around Mrs Wolff’s daughter
Adelheid. The poster we propose will be a visualization of the sequence of
events we propose, what we plan to accomplish with the proposal, and the
results of our work. Finally, we are throwing around different ideas for
creatively delivering the proposed final act. One idea was having Frau Wolff
find Adelheid’s hidden journal, where she finds out she’s been betrayed by her
daughter for her chance in the spotlight. Can you think of some other
suggestions for a means of adequately delivering our proposed plot-line to the
class?
I'm really excited to read what you write for the new ending! I was disappointed with the ending of The Beaver Coat, so maybe after reading yours I will have a different opinion. I think your idea of using Adelheid's journal would work well.
ReplyDeleteThe journal idea is a good one but remember that Mrs. Wolff wants her daughter in the spotlight so would it really be betrayal?
ReplyDeleteI also want to see what you come up for as an ending. I do agree that attempting to write a final act in the same style would be near impossible due to inconsistencies in style and time period.
ReplyDeleteI think I will like your new ending a lot more than I did the real ending. I don't think I like the slice of life type of stories because there isn't too much of a plot.
ReplyDeleteI really want to see what you guys come up with for your project. I don't know how the journal thing will turn out, because Adelheid seemed to not be bright enough to orchestrate a betrayal and too lazy to actually put a plan into action. The other daughter (whose name is escaping me right now... Leotine? Something like that.) on the other hand, made vague threats to her mother about revealing their dirty little secrets, so I think she would be much more likely to betray her family than her older sister.
ReplyDelete