I think this play is interesting from a female perspective,
because my initial reaction was that the play sounds sympathetic to women and
feminism. In truth, if taken in the history and context at the time Lysistrata was written, it is the
opposite of a feminist work. The idea that a woman would conspire to go against
her husband or any man was absurd. In today’s terms, this play would be a
comedy of epic proportions, because the events in the play are so ridiculous to Athens men, that they thought it was hilarious in 411 B.C. This reminds me of the movie
Cats and Dogs, where the humans are portrayed as the sub-intelligent species,
compared to the highly intelligent canines and felines. I also think it is
important to remember that this play would have been performed by all males, so
you can imagine men, pretending to be women, telling other men pretending to be
women, how great their butt looks . . . very comical when you think about it.
The leading lady, Lysistrata, states at the very beginning
that there are no more men left in Athens, because if there was a true man, the
war would be ended. The underlying idea that a woman could end the war, because
there were no real men, was a political jab to the ruling men of
Athens by Aristophanes, the author of the comedy, who wrote this play during
the Peloponnesian War being fought between Athens and Sparta. The idea
presented in the play that if the money was cut off from the men, this might
end the war, and that women could budget better than the Athens men--showed clear underlying frustrations that the
money was being mishandled by the men at war, and even women could do better.
I believe this play is more political, rather than gender
related. Aristophanes portrays most of the women as weak, inferior, senseless
and preoccupied—these things would all be in keeping with a stereotypical
female in 411 B.C. from a male’s point of view. Aristophanes was saying that
even a female could do better than what our government is doing. Ironically,
many times they can. Even though this writing was meant to be funny and absurd, I bet there were still women who were impacted by some of the ideas presented in this play.
Something else I thought was very funny—Lampito , the
Spartan girl, was portrayed as the ‘hillbilly’ of all the women. It was amusing
to me that I had no trouble at all reading her dialect in the story.
I agree with you saying that the play is more political rather than gender related. The men are away at war doing whatever while the women are left at home to care for the rest of the family, the children, and also the rest of society. Since most of the men are preoccupied with the war and such, who's left to deal with society?
ReplyDeleteI suppose that this goes to show how history can repeat itself, with pundits mocking the government and it's actions while people laugh away! It's amazing how some of the things being made fun of in this play are somehow relevant today.
ReplyDelete