Sunday, January 26, 2014

Lysistrata- Political satire at its finest….


I think this play is interesting from a female perspective, because my initial reaction was that the play sounds sympathetic to women and feminism. In truth, if taken in the history and context at the time Lysistrata was written, it is the opposite of a feminist work. The idea that a woman would conspire to go against her husband or any man was absurd. In today’s terms, this play would be a comedy of epic proportions, because the events in the play are so ridiculous to Athens men, that they thought it was hilarious in 411 B.C. This reminds me of the movie Cats and Dogs, where the humans are portrayed as the sub-intelligent species, compared to the highly intelligent canines and felines. I also think it is important to remember that this play would have been performed by all males, so you can imagine men, pretending to be women, telling other men pretending to be women, how great their butt looks . . . very comical when you think about it.

The leading lady, Lysistrata, states at the very beginning that there are no more men left in Athens, because if there was a true man, the war would be ended. The underlying idea that a woman could end the war, because there were no real men, was a political jab to the ruling men of Athens by Aristophanes, the author of the comedy, who wrote this play during the Peloponnesian War being fought between Athens and Sparta. The idea presented in the play that if the money was cut off from the men, this might end the war, and that women could budget better than the Athens men--showed clear underlying frustrations that the money was being mishandled by the men at war, and even women could do better.

I believe this play is more political, rather than gender related. Aristophanes portrays most of the women as weak, inferior, senseless and preoccupied—these things would all be in keeping with a stereotypical female in 411 B.C. from a male’s point of view. Aristophanes was saying that even a female could do better than what our government is doing. Ironically, many times they can. Even though this writing was meant to be funny and absurd, I bet there were still women who were impacted by some of the ideas presented in this play. 

Something else I thought was very funny—Lampito , the Spartan girl, was portrayed as the ‘hillbilly’ of all the women. It was amusing to me that I had no trouble at all reading her dialect in the story. 

2 comments:

  1. I agree with you saying that the play is more political rather than gender related. The men are away at war doing whatever while the women are left at home to care for the rest of the family, the children, and also the rest of society. Since most of the men are preoccupied with the war and such, who's left to deal with society?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I suppose that this goes to show how history can repeat itself, with pundits mocking the government and it's actions while people laugh away! It's amazing how some of the things being made fun of in this play are somehow relevant today.

    ReplyDelete