Lysistrata is a
comedic play written by Aristophanes. During his time, all roles were played by
males. That means female characters were played by males, too. Aristophanes
seems to empower his women characters in Lysistrata, yet actors in his day were
males. Did he empower the female characters to show that women have a voice and
that he sided with having equal opportunities for females and males? No!
The females in this play, including
Lysistrata, were just tools to help males mature. They’re not becoming
independent and equal with males at all. This play implies that females are
only useful for being good mothers and enticing, exciting sexual partners. It didn’t
matter whether or not Lysistrata or any of the females wanted the war to end.
The power is placed in the males to end the war.
Yes, Lysistrata and
another female named Peace were there in the end to help delegate between the
Spartans and the Athens, but Lysistrata acted like a mother over two quibbling
boy-like men. To illustrate this, when the Spartan argues that Kinesias is
taking too much land, Lysistrata (the mother-figure) says, “Don’t argue. Let
the legs go (pg.448).” Kinesias agrees, and the Athens and Spartans conclude
their truce. Lysistrata finishes off her role by saying “Now first attend to
your purification, then we, the women, will welcome you to the Citadel and
treat you to all the delights of a home cooked banquet…. And every man of you
will take his wife and depart for home (pg.44).” Not only does this quote make
her sound like a good house wife and hostess, but it also makes it sound like
she and the rest of the women are content with just being housewives/mothers
and nothing more. Also, another example on pg. 393, the Commissioner shouts,“I
DO NOT WANT TO BE SAVED. DAMMIT!” Lysistrata replies, “All the more reason. It’s
not only Sparta; now we’ll have to save you from you.” This scene is analogous to
a mother calming a little boy with a tantrum.
Lysistrata may have
came up with a great idea with ending the war by comparing her ideas to fleece
on pg. 399-400, but ending the war for what? End the war so women can be
rejoiced with males and still become housewives or mothers.
Also, the girl
named Peace was at the truce delegation. She had no voice. Her only purpose for
being there was her body. Of all women, Lysistrata chose her because of her
body. It’s most likely she knew Peace’s body would cause the males to come
terms quickly and end the war to finally satisfy their hungering sexual desires.
They even use her body as a map. The male Spartan said, “We’ll take that butte….
Sparta’s Back door (pg.447).” Kinesias chimed in with, “Let’s try Thessaly…. And
down to Megara for the legs (pg. 448).” These words may not be as great as the
action, but imagine these men ogling at a young girl with saliva coming down
the side of their face as they talk. They treat this girl like an object and
her function is to be some enticing sexual partner.
Another example
of this degrading role is when Kinesias uses the baby to lure Myrrhine to him: “Where’s
you maternal instinct? … How can you be so pitiless?... Come down here, dear.
For the baby’s sake (pg.423-424).” He lures her to him and finally gets to his
main problem: “You love me? So what’s the trouble? Lie down (pg.426).” He wants to have sexual intercourse with her.
He doesn’t care about the baby. That’s what he really sought from her. He may
be her husband, but there’s more lust than love in this play. On pg. 433, he
does refer to Myrrhine as his “dove, [his] sweet,” but this so-called love is
belittled every time his erection and horniness is mentioned.
In conclusion,
this play does give women a voice/role. However that role is just being a
housewife/mother and being an enticing sexual partner.
You made a very interesting comment about the degradation of Peace during the peace talks, but many abstract concepts, such as peace, and other socio-political ideas have been conveyed as women throughout history. For example, Britannia, Marianne, Columbia, Laissez-Faire, Justice, Truth, and many other abstract notions are conveyed through literature and art as women. I do not disagree with your disdain for the blatant lasciviousness of the men, but the portrayal of Peace as a female has historical as well as comical significance in Lysistrata.
ReplyDeleteI agree with all you say here. I enjoyed reading the play and thought it was funny, but I was a little sad at the end that the women got nothing out of their peace efforts except their men coming home, and really, seeing as how the men acted, who would want them home for long? After all their efforts, all the women will just go home to be housewives again. I know the play was written at a time when realistically women didn't have any other options, so I didn't expect any other ending, but still I was saddened for the women themselves.
ReplyDelete